comments on: what is high-level resourcing? - 瑞士vs喀麦隆足彩赔率

by: michael lepage

tue, 24 apr 2018 18:50:45 +0000

in reply to nancy.

costs are by default spread linearly on an activity. if you goto the resource assignments screen, you can set up the columns to see the spread: https://www.screencast.com/t/197nyv81kkox

]]>

by: nancy

thu, 19 apr 2018 15:16:33 +0000

good morning – i’m trying to find out the details of having cost-loaded 世界杯时间比赛时间 on a loe. i have a 96 hour fire watch that is an loe. how is the cost spread across the 96 hours on a 5×10 calendar. do i use a simple linear curve if the fire watch is there for every shift with no sense that the fire watch will be front- or back-end loaded.

]]>

by: plannertuts

wed, 10 sep 2014 14:33:03 +0000

in reply to corey smart.

yep – that’s the view you want corey – resource assignments page.

]]>

by: corey smart

tue, 09 sep 2014 20:21:27 +0000

corey smart. ack! always seems i find my own answer 5 minutes after i post something! i was trying to add things from the wrong view. switched to the resource assignments view (via the projects menu) and all is good now! corey]]>

by: corey smart

tue, 09 sep 2014 20:15:31 +0000

nice post… i’ve done this a few times to keep track of our project controls staff across our portfolio of work. for future work i’ll assign a role and switch that to a resource once i know who is allocated to the job. current work gets a resource, of course! definitely helpful to visualize when we have people coming available and when we’re going to need to start hiring.

one thing i’m struggling with (being a manager and not a scheduler) is the best way to allocate 世界杯时间比赛时间 . once i have a portfolio of 40, 50 or more projects set up (each as a simple one-liner) is there an easy way to switch over to a resource view and enter their activity assignments from there? i’ve found the resource usage spreadsheet, but it doesn’t seem like i can add assignments from that screen.

cheers!
corey

]]>

by: rick

fri, 22 aug 2014 23:28:00 +0000

charles wright. i guess it depends what you want to do with the future resource. i use resource units to assess labor needs for entire project phases using past 'actual' hours in ftes and finding the variance from the 'planned' ftes. then with a 4-week (or 6 or 8) look-ahead we can look to see if 'actual' ftes are trending toward planned and thus staying at burn rate]]>

by: charles wright

sun, 17 nov 2013 19:34:52 +0000

nice post, but disagreed.

resource loading schedules into the future is bad practice. role loading schedules into the future is the correct method. don’t freeze a resource availability for high level unknowns into the future, define the role, essentially the need / or product being sold pre-execution, then staff the resource by replacing the available resource just prior to execution. that’s why the high level planning tool in p6 web allows roles only. replacing a role with a resource takes the management role of staffing off the planners hands and gives it to the right reason, the project manager…

]]>