{"id":31461,"date":"2018-03-17t08:45:22","date_gmt":"2018-03-17t12:45:22","guid":{"rendered":"\/\/www.deco-dalles.com\/?p=31461"},"modified":"2019-10-18t12:18:19","modified_gmt":"2019-10-18t16:18:19","slug":"new-stats-global-construction-dispute-trends","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"\/\/www.deco-dalles.com\/new-stats-global-construction-dispute-trends\/","title":{"rendered":"new stats: global construction dispute trends"},"content":{"rendered":"
update: [arcadis contract solutions 2018 report]<\/a><\/p>\n arcadis contract solutions released their global construction disputes 2017 report \u2013 avoiding the same pitfalls<\/a>. the 30-page report offers insight into the global construction contract landscape with recent stats and trends about constructions disputes.<\/p>\n according to arcadis, in 2014, the most common cause of disputes was a failure to properly administer contracts. in 2016, this remains as the number one cause if disputes.<\/p>\n the study found that in 2016, the issue with employers, contractors and subcontractors failing to understand and\/or comply with their contracted obligations have moved up in the ranks of dispute causes from last year.<\/p>\n arcadis reports that their was an increase in joint venture related differences, as it accounts for 32.2%<\/strong> of disputes.<\/p>\n the research found that the average value of disputes decreased from the previous year:<\/strong><\/p>\n <\/p>\n <h3<\/p>\n the top methods ranked in the report by arcadis are:<\/strong><\/p>\n the research was derived from disputes that the company handled in 2016 and relevant industry experts. it puts a spotlight on the major causes of disputes<\/a> and how they were resolved in north america, asia, middle east, continental europe and the uk.<\/p>\n highlighted below in the graphs are the cost and length of time it took to resolve the global construction dispute based on the geographical regions.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n the most common causes of disputes were:<\/strong><\/p>\n the common method of resolving these issues was party to party negotiation<\/a> (remained the same).<\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n the most common causes of disputes in asia were:<\/strong><\/p>\n the common method of resolving these issues was arbitration (changed from party to party negotiation).<\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n the most common causes of disputes in asia were:<\/strong><\/p>\n the common method of resolving these issues was party to party negotiation.<\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n the most common causes of disputes in asia were:<\/strong><\/p>\n the common method of resolving these issues was adjudication (contract or ad-hoc) which is new (changes from party to party negotiation).<\/p>\n —<\/p>\n <\/p>\n the most common causes of disputes in europe were:<\/strong><\/p>\n the common method of resolving these issues is party to party negotiation with a new one being expert determination coming in second.<\/p>\n overall the findings have seen a positive outlook on the global growth, however nothing is ever linear. the time it takes to resolve a dispute and the value of these disputes have decreased, but with uncertainty in the market, it is always good to keep these key factors in mind so you can spot any issues and avoid them before it becomes serious problem.<\/p>\n editor\u2019s note:<\/strong> this post was originally published july 2015 but has been updated and revamped for accuracy.<\/em><\/p>\n for all of the details, read the full report here –\u00a0global construction dispute 2017<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\ncauses for disputes (ranked from highest to lowest):<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
direct influential factors the disputes:<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
\nnorth america<\/h3>\n
\n
asia<\/h3>\n
\n
middle east<\/h3>\n
\n
united kingdom<\/h3>\n
\n
continental europe<\/h3>\n
\n
summary<\/h3>\n